Showing posts with label NY TIMES. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NY TIMES. Show all posts

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Obesity Studies... What is a Cause?

   It isn't often that I refer you to an article in full that has been written by someone else, or in this case, a couple of someones.  You can trust that I am doing it for a good reason.  The article published in the NY Times addresses a point often made here.  Headlines and research should be interpreted carefully.  
   I believe that these two journalists get it exactly right (one hails from Union College - yay).  I only have one or two things to add, but I really think you should read the article first... click HERE
 Okay - I feel like you didn't listen to me.  The article is about junk food advertising and soda sizes causing obesity.   Read it HERE.


OK.
The only big problem I had was with the journalists' assertion that we do not know what causes obesity.  Of course we do.  A lot of people eating more calories than they need (and the number they need is personal).  There are reasons that people eat more calories than they need and some of those reasons are ones that I want to study.  I want to use the exact type of research design that the journalists advocate.  But, I do not think randomization into conditions will always (or ever) be possible.  Lagged interventions, or lagged policies may allow me to make good inferences. By this I mean, if one state adopts a public health policy before a similar state does, I can compare the two states on the outcome (calories purchased, BMI, etc). Most of the time,  my work will speak to associations, relationships, correlations and that is ok. I hope I  can get to cause, but I won't pretend that I did when I did not.
     I would reword some of the journalists language about the studies they referenced.  It is true that advertisements do not cause weight gain - but they may entice people.  Ads may lead people to establishments where they over consume. Once inside the restaurant, is there any hope?  Maybe.  It is possible that putting the number of calories per item on a menu might encourage people to chose an item with fewer calories.  Having to put calorie numbers on a menu might encourage the restaurant owner to offer more low calorie items.  
   Having less billboards, less fast food places, higher prices on nutrient poor foods, removing sodas from WIC and SNAP benefits...Polices like these might reduce consumption of foods that are very high in calories... but at the end of the day.. it will always be about a choice that a person makes.  If that choice includes too many calories.. weight gain is likely to follow.   
(ps if you think that the government wants to manipulate you and the food industry doesn't, you are woefully naive)

Saturday, November 10, 2012

SEX

    As a woman living in the USA, I have many advantages.  I experience more freedom, power, agency, and equity than women in many non Western countries.  I have greater privilege than my American ancestors from as little as 50 to 100 years ago.  Yet as far as women have come, it is not perfect.
   Women's education, work and political experiences are inferior to men's and this difference is more pronounced for women of color.  But it is the sexual disparity that I focus on today.
   It starts with the terms that we use.  For women we refer to reproductive health and for men, sexual healthPrimary care for women is meant to address fertility, maternal health, and to prevent cancer of the reproductive organs (breast, cervix, uterus, etc).  For men, primary care is more than fertility and cancer prevention.  One of the goals if not the main goal is the ability to engage in sex.  To have fun. 
   Long after a man is expected to procreate, it is important for him to have sex.  Why is that?  Why is it important for the MAN particularly.
  I am not one, but with few exceptions (e.g., pain with ejaculation) I expect that having sex = enjoyment for men.
  A fantastic post by Dr. Jane Brody was published in the NY Times blog on August 6th.  I want you to read it (man or woman).  She brings attention to the problem of painful intercourse for a growing number of women.  The discomfort is associated with a lack of estrogen which occurs for many reasons that are explained in the article.  Women can "have sex" without experiencing pleasure. In fact, some medical conditions make sex extremely unpleasant.
   As Dr. Brody explains, this leads many women to become asbstinant (to avoid sex) and it has a negative effect on relationships and mental health.
   But there are NOT any commercials about this. If this were a man problem, we would be forced to watch ads about a pill that would fix it.
   I doubt insurance covers estrogen creams.  That is NOT ok.  Read the blog.  Talk to your doctor. You can even print the post and bring it with you to an appointment!