Showing posts with label cooking low calorie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cooking low calorie. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Roll Your Own

Now that got your attention didn't it. But really, I mean pizza rolls. And really really, I don't actually roll them. Today's blog then, is lighter fair.. literally and figuratively.

As a health educator I am focused on providing people with skills and knowledge so a change can occur in beliefs, attitudes and actions.

Today I empower you, especially parents, to provide a healthy alternative to a very popular kid snack, the pizza roll or pizza bite. If you make my pizza wontons and substitute them for the same serving size (85g) of Totino's Pizza Rolls, your children will get:

55 less calories (175 mine 230 Totino's)

10 less grams of fat (about .5g mine and 11g Totino's)

135 mg less sodium (405 mg sodium mine and 540 mg Totino's)



It isn't hard and a video recipe for the sauce and the rolls is below. Enjoy.







Friday, June 12, 2009

Counting Calories

Today I return to the issue of calories and I do that as a health education specialist, not as a nutritionist. By that I mean, I am able to and pressed to, educate people on nutrition guidelines and concepts but not on individual nutrient or calorie needs.

It is true that the majority of Americans are overweight or obese and because of that many have been advised to lose weight. According to premier health experts and programs, including the Cooper Institute which you can link to below this post, the best way to lose weight is to cut calories. The best way to maintain weight loss is to control calories and to exercise.

When your goal is to influence the behavior of others, as mine is, it is helpful to start where the "others" are and to use personal experience if you have it and evidenced based solutions if they exist. You are in luck as I can provide all of the above! I know what it is like to be overweight, I know what it is like to have dieted and dieted and dieted, better still, I know what it is like NOT to do that anymore. Science says we have to eat less energy then we expend to lose weight. The public health consensus is that almost to a person we overestimate the calories we expend and underestimate the calories we consume.

Reducing caloric intake scares the hell out of people. We just do not want to be deprived. I know. Dr. Barabara Rolls and others say that low energy dense foods can make cutting the calories different from cutting volume. One can lose weight without hunger pains and deprivation. Volumetrics is a safe, effective and pleasant way to improve health. Yes, I said pleasant.

As it turns out, Dr. Rolls has a study published in the journal Physiology and Behavior from March of this year. I haven't read the article yet, only the abstract. But here is your evidence.

The relationship between dietary energy density and energy intake
Barbara J. Rolls ⁎

The Department of Nutritional Sciences, 226 Henderson Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-6501


I am doing my best to provide you with science and evidence based programs as I don't diet and do not endorse ANY diet program.

Also, I want you to listen to the commercials especially from Nutra System, w/ their special diets for men and for diabetes or people who don't want to get diabetes. And really listen, because what the announcer says is this... "clinically tested". Read that again. Tested is not Proven.

Anyways, I meant today to be a short blog with a video focus. It did not turn out that way. Still, the video is short - 5 minutes - and showcases a very filling 150 calorie meal.





Monday, June 1, 2009

Energy Density: What you need to know...

Energy density is the amount of energy in a given unit of measurement. For food it is the amount of calories per gram. In recent years, nutritionists and public health specialists have begun to suggest that adults and children eat low energy dense foods. I imagine the increased popularity comes from the Volumetrics concept that is the work of Penn State professor, Dr. Barbara Rolls. http://nutrition.psu.edu/faculty/profiles.cfm?facultyid=21

Ideally we would eat foods that are low in calories and high in nutrients. If you do this you get more bang for your buck, more nutrition for your calorie. You get to eat MORE. It is similar to using those UPC shelf labels at the grocery store. For example, there are at least a dozen brands of yogurt in the dairy section and the prices vary greatly. The tags on the shelf can tell you which item has the lowest price per unit. I was looking at this very thing yesterday and the containers that appeared to be the same size offered me single containers at 38, 50 and 52 cent prices. And on the shelf I saw 6.4, 8.4 even 11.4.. per unit. This tells you that the 6.4 cent per unit was the cheapest. The lowest price isn't always the cheapest. If we can buy the less expensive product then we can make our money go further. We are budgeting. We are frugal.

This is exactly how low energy density eating works as long as you are mindful of the nutrient side of it. Celery and lettuce may be very low density but they are also low in nutrients, so not the best every day choices.

Here is how you figure the calorie per gram of your foods. Look at the serving size and divide the calories by the grams.

A chips ahoy cookie package states that the serving size is 27 g and the calories for that are 120. If we divide 120 by 27 we get 4.4 calories by gram. That is moderately high. Peanut butter is higher, but some peanut butter is good for you. Obviously, a natural peanut butter (smuckers) has nutrients your body needs and the cookies do not.
Fats and oils are very high in calories per gram while MOST vegetables and many fruits are low. Grains are moderate, but heart healthy.

If you don't have a nutrient label use the USDA calorie database. Look up your food and it gives you weight options, including 100g. So just pick that one and move the decimal in two places.

http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/

More examples, spaghetti squash and egg plant have less than .3 cals per gram, strawberries and wax beans have .3 cals per gram. Apples, .5. Bananas .9. Mushrooms, summer squashes, bell peppers, all extremely low (less than .3/g) and high in nutrients, tomatoes too. Winter squash and pumpkin are also superb sources of nutrition with low calorie per gram. Apples are .51 and sweet potatoes .84. That is why I mix my sweet potatoes with a pepper, to volumize them and my plate. Lettuce. cabbages and leafy greens which have more nutrients are also great. Note the spaghetti squash is .27 and regular spaghetti is 1.6 so you can eat a lot more of the vegetable than the grain.

Obviously meats with more saturated fat are higher in ED. Fish (including tuna fish) is low, salmon is higher, but also better for you. Choose to fill your plate with the low ED foods and include the others sparingly.

I always bulk up my salad and or stir fry with onions, mushrooms, tomatoes and sometimes peppers. Lentils are a fantastic low calorie source of protein. Many of the meals I have on You Tube are made from low energy high nutrient dense foods and importantly, I do not add OIL, Butter or sauces to change that when I cook or serve them.

http://www.youtube.com/deerunstoo


This is how you can eat less without eating less !

Friday, April 3, 2009

Wellness Weekly

The News:

Migraines and Me: Today I do not have a headache…. I have not known such gratefulness since I experienced severe back pain, which also resolved. A long time ago, pre 2002, I had a migraine on Christmas Day… my first. After that experience I would always be clear in stating that I had a severe headache or even a submigraine, from time to time, but having had a migraine I would NEVER mis categorize a headache. Since that Christmas Day I may have had two more migraines and I have never sought assistance for them as I am determined NOT to be someone who suffers from migraines. That changed this week. I have had more migraines in the last ten days than in my over 40 years of life. I did everything I usually do and could not barrel through them. I saw my doctor. Good news is that he believes something in the environment triggered a severe episode that just cascaded into migraine after migraine with remission but not resolution. He did say we had to break the cycle. He did say we had to do it with a medication. Readers know that I do not do prescription medication. And my bigger fear is (was) to become someone who has to keep medication on hand. He believed that this is or was an isolated incident and I trust him in that. I also appreciate how he presented the options, there were three. He discussed cost, side effects and other people’s responses. I accepted a sample of a medicine by Pfizer… I know, that alone almost killed me, but I was beyond my capacity to withstand any more pain. I am a distance runner.. I CAN endure pain and thus it was THAT bad. So I took my samples home and I took the first pill and lied (or laid) there two hours waiting for it to work. I was under the impression that I was going to have almost immediate relief and feel like I took morphine or something. HA. The pain trickled away, it did not stop abruptly. That was Wednesday night. Thursday I was traumatized and scared to tears that it would come back… today I feel somewhat more confident. I am writing mostly to address the prescription drug issue as I continue to think pills should be a very last resort, that they are entirely too expensive and the side effects are not to be taken lightly. That being said, Wednesday I did not read the label of my new medicine. The doctor warned of GI upset and that I thought would be tolerable. I can tell you that as I lie there I considered that this prescription drug could kill me and I did not care. So maybe this experience offers me a little empathy to why some people risk horrible side effects when they take meds though it does not change my belief that wherever possible prevention of disease is the better “medicine”.
Attention Parents: Childhood Obesity: I am taking a course through the University of Tennessee for my health educator credential (CEUs) and have a few interesting pearls to share with you. The course is taught by MDs, RDs, and PhDs. Dr. Velasquez-Mieyer noted that what we see in adults started as children. Dayle Hayes, M.S., R.D. encourages people who are concerned about children’s nutrition to join their school health advisory committee, also known as SHAC. And Dr. Hollie Raynor offers important strategies for dealing with the treatment of obesity in children. Dr. Raynor is by far my favorite lecturer in this series. She and her team do provide intensive treatment to overweight elementary school aged children. They do this within the university setting and thus can apply rigorous research protocols as well. There are things in her methodology that you can apply at home right now whether or not your child is obese. This includes focusing on behaviors. For example, she does have young children weigh themselves (not a standard thing you should do, this is for children in a targeted obesity treatment program) but when there is a 2 pound weight loss, for example, she offers positive reinforcement and encourages the child to pinpoint what behavior may have led to that. Which of the actions is the cause of the weight change - less TV time, more walking or riding the bike, or even more green foods then red foods (my favorite traffic light program!)? It is also part of this family centered program that the parents adopt the SAME behavior as the child. If the child has to eat less of the red foods, so does the parent! Parents must also increase the physical activity. Even better, she talks about covert and overt food restriction. Dr. Raynor prefers covert. Covert restriction involves not having the food in the house at all. Overt is like buying ice cream but telling the child they can’t have any. This might lead to tantrums and all kinds of issues, but if the food isn’t there it isn’t there! Sure they might eat it somewhere else, but they aren’t eating it at home. Another good point she made was that in children we want to change the food preference. So there may be a less bad option of a food, say baked chips instead of regular chips, but they are still chips. Don’t serve chips! Changing preferences. Serve wheat and or whole grain bread, no other kind. I could go on. Ok one last thing. We want kids to be more active, so TVs out of their bedrooms and action toys available. If they like to ride their bike, then make sure the tires are good and the bike is easily accessible.
Generics: Okay, even though Pfizer appears to have helped me out, I am not going to abandon my quest for fairness with pharmaceuticals. I am happy then to report that there are a few versions of bills circulating in the US Congress which attempt to stop drug companies from paying generic makers to HOLD OFF on the release of their cheaper versions. Often times during this extension, the brand name company works to tweak the medicine in question, as I have described before, perhaps making it a long acting type or a liquid type and then convincing the user that they need the new kind. So months later the generic of the medicine you have taken for years is available but your doctor has switched you to the extended release formula and the generic doesn’t come in that. What a bunch of bunk. I hope this is addressed by our legislators.
HFCS: High Fructose Corn Syrup is bad. We don’t really need to get into the hows and whys, but it is a highly processed thing and is worse than sugar, even simple white sugar. I bring it up now because I made a comment at work this week regarding one of my favorite portion controlled snacks. These sugar wafer cookies made and or marketed by a Mexican company are lower in calories than other brands. Four of the wafers (chocolate, strawberry or vanilla) have 120 calories. They are long and thin and compared to other sugar wafers, even ones that say they are sugar free, these have less calories. I think the label must be wrong. Still, one of my awesome coworkers (many of my coworkers are indeed awesome) said it is because the other types have HFCS and that is more caloric. HMM. Intuitively I think that the corn syrup is just a big vat of sticky sweet stuff and way high in cals yes, but wouldn’t that mean you’d use less of it than you would sugar. I did check my cookie label, and YES Beth is right so far… NO HFCS. Now, let me do a little Google check and see if I learn anything to uphold the theory…. BRB>>>>>>>>>>>
Oh My Gosh. I should have seen this coming…now HFCS is still evil, but it does not have more calories than sugar, in fact it has less. Sugar is a carb with 4 kcals per gram while HFCS has 3/g. So I started looking up all the sugar wafers, esp. the sugar free ones, which mine are not. The culprit isn’t the sugar it is FAT. Mine have 4g of fat per serving whereas the Voortman and Murray…have 8g. That is it right there; they replaced the sugar with fat. I will be damned. Oh and be assured it is not monounsaturated fat. Now I am not claiming my Mexican sugar cookies are a green (GO) food, but that I like sweets too and these are lower in calories. YEAH! Remember neither fat free nor sugar free means calorie free and yes, there is more calorie per gram of fat than sugar – 5 more to be exact.

Okay, let’s do some cooking. A Stir Fry Volumetrics Dinner is featured today.

Ingredients include:

Spices: Onion and Garlic Powder, Cumin and Turmeric
Veggies: Zucchini, Sweet Potato, Red Pepper
Stir Fry ingredients: Shredded cabbage, onion, mushroom and tomato
Protein: Smart Strips steak style (found in the produce section – no nitrates)
Fruit: Apple with Waldon Farms SF Marshmallow Dip

Oh non fat spray and water is also needed.

That will bring us to today’s cooking video. The point of these videos is to assist you in eating food, lots of food really, without adding non nutritive and even disease promoting extras.. like saturated FAT and sugar.
BTW, I may have had one of those headaches in this video… I apologize if I am less than bubbly today. Seriously.

Live Well
Deirdre